![]() The next year, voters approved reinstating capital punishment in a ballot measure that was partially financed by Ricketts, a death penalty supporter. The broker later said his shipments were being blocked and refused to return the money. Pete Ricketts sent $54,400 in state money to a broker in India who promised to deliver lethal injection drugs. As lawmakers were considering the move, prison officials and Republican Gov. Nebraska lawmakers narrowly abolished capital punishment in 2015, largely due to a coalition of conservative legislators who viewed it as a waste of money given how long it had been since the state had an execution. That same year, Nebraska executed its first inmate since 1997, using the drugs prison officials obtained from the unknown supplier. The case had been under appeal since a district court judge ordered the department to release the records in 2018. Going forward, the Attorney General expects the parties will work together to bring this to a resolution.” The Nebraska attorney general's office, which represented the department, issued a statement saying: “The Attorney General appreciates the Court providing clarity on multiple issues of first impression and on prior case law. Corrections Director Scott Frakes told a legislative committee in 2017 that it would be “very difficult” to acquire more drugs if the department was forced to identify its suppliers. “Open, transparent government is a bedrock Nebraska tradition it’s so deeply valued by citizens across the political spectrum because it provides a check on the abuses of big government," Conrad said.Ī spokesman for the Department of Correctional Services said Friday that the state's supply of execution drugs has expired. The high court rejected that, writing that the department’s “contentions contradict the text of Nebraska’s public records statutes and are adverse to this court’s public records precedent.”ĭanielle Conrad, the ACLU of Nebraska’s executive director, said she was pleased with the court’s ruling “that Nebraskans have a right to know what the state is doing with taxpayer dollars.” Prison officials said the supplier should be considered a member of the official “execution team,” whose identities are confidential under Nebraska law. The Omaha World-Herald, the Lincoln Journal Star and the ACLU of Nebraska sued after those request were denied, arguing that the department had violated Nebraska's open-records laws. A leading prisoner advocacy group, the American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska, filed a similar request. Media outlets including The Associated Press, The Omaha World-Herald and The Lincoln Journal Star filed formal requests in 2017 for purchase orders and other records that would have identified Nebraska's supplier. Some states have moved to keep their suppliers secret, but Nebraska lawmakers have rejected “shield laws” that would have given prison officials the authority to withhold such records. Pharmaceutical companies object to their products being used in executions and have sought to prevent pharmacies from providing them. Before that, the department had regularly disclosed such records to anyone who requested them.Īt the time, the agency was under mounting pressure to obtain lethal injection drugs as death-penalty critics questioned whether Nebraska would ever carry out another execution. In ordering the documents to be disclosed for public scrutiny, the Nebraska Supreme Court sided with two newspapers and a prisoner advocacy group that sued the Department of Correctional Services after its 2017 refusal to release them. – Nebraska prison officials cannot withhold public records that reveal where they purchased their supply of lethal injection drugs, the state's highest court said Friday in a ruling that could threaten Nebraska's ability to carry out executions for the dozen men on its death row.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |